www.karissalaurel.com |
I'm a fan of the Shadow and Bone ("Grishaverse") novels by Leigh Bardugo, so naturally when the Netflix series came out, I gobbled it right up. I had watched the casting announcements, and while most of the actors picked for the main roles were unfamiliar to me, one crucial one was not.
When the producers named Ben Barnes as the Darkling, aka General Kirigan, aka Aleksander, I fan-girl flipped out. The Darkling is the main antagonist of the series, though he doesn't necessarily start out that way. At one point in the books, and on the show, the Darkling is also a potential romantic interest for the main character, Alina Starkov. Any actor that played him had to be handsome, suave, erudite, a little distant and cold, and above all, sexy.
Have you seen Ben Barnes as Billy Russo in The Punisher? How about as Logan in West World? Okay, as Logan he might have been more "spoiled asshole" than "sexy villain" but still... there really wasn't anyone more suited for the Darkling than him, in my opinion. He absolutely lived up to my expectations.
Oh, those expectations... Barnes's performance, physical appearance, sex appeal, etc. has caused quite the stir on social media ever since the show's release. It has also spawned a ton of blog posts and commentary, so I kind of feel like I'm beating a dead horse by talking about this subject again. But I here I go anyway...
There are three main camps I'm seeing when it comes to Romancing the Villain:
- Romanticizing villains is bad and you should never ever do it. Nothing about abuse, violence, murder, corruption, etc., is romantic. Ever.
- Romanticizing villains is okay as long as you acknowledge what makes them problematic and don't condone such behavior in the real world. Your fantasies are a safe space to work out complex feelings.
- Romanticizing villains is okay and don't apologize for your lust. Embrace the evil! Ride or Die, Bitches!
You never want a big wet kiss from Jabba, do you? |
I talked about this issue with fellow ATB contributor, Mary Fan, who is often my go-to when I'm wrestling with issues like this, either in the media I'm consuming or in my own writing. She calls this phenomenon the "Hotness Absolution". It's her contention, and I agree, that if Jabba had been a hot human (or humanoid), people would have been a lot more into the Leia-as-his-slave thing. Would people have shipped Reylo so hard if Kylo never took of his mask? I think our recent text conversation sums up this contradiction perfectly:
Mary: No one shipped anyone with Palpatine...
Me: Right!
Mary: Hmm does anyone romanticize Evil Anakin? I haven’t hung out in fan forums much but I feel like they don’t really romanticize him at all...
Me: I know way back in the day people were writing some very smutty stuff involving Darth Maul. I read a few stories that were 😮😮😮😮
Mary: LOLLLLLL
Me: I mean, other than the creepy teeth and eyes, Ray Park
is/was very, um, "fit". So, I guess if people can have a furry kink,
why not an evil Sith kink?
Mary: I guess?? I mean yeah Ray Park was young, twenty-something martial artist with a British accent so I get that. Ha ha. People gonna
people...
Me: Exactly
Mary: I wonder if any of those people romanticized his
portrayal of the Toad in X-Men
Me: *Dies laughing*
3 comments:
Ok but romanticizing a villain is not the same as having a """crush""" on them. You confindustria a villain attractive while still thinking that their actions are wrong. Search the meaning of the word "romanticizing" on a dictionary. It has nothing to do with finding someone attractive.
Ok but romanticizing a villain is not the same as having a """crush""" on them. You can find a villain attractive while still thinking that their actions are wrong. Search the meaning of the word "romanticizing" on a dictionary. It has nothing to do with finding someone attractive.
Good reading yoour post
Post a Comment